.jpg "can i use mac mini for home recording")
Not just for the reasons I outlined above but also because not all of the apps I use have been fully optimized or work 100% of the time on the M1. I love being an early adopter and I'm really freaking excited about Apple's Mac silicon, however, it's just too early for me to use an M1 computer as a production machine to edit videos, record podcasts, etc.
#CAN I USE MAC MINI FOR HOME RECORDING PRO#
When it comes to multi-core performance, the iMac Pro still has the M1 beat, you can see that for yourself with the benchmarks, but it's certainly true with exporting videos with Final Cut Pro and other apps that can take advantage of all of my iMac Pro's 10-cores. That's not to say that the M1 CPU isn't powerful or impressive – it is, it just isn't ideal for my workflows (yet). Apps launch faster, respond faster, and just feel more fluid on the iMac Pro. Things feel snappier on my iMac Pro than they did on the Mac mini M1. Nonetheless, this lack of cache is noticeable (at least to me) when performing tasks. In fact, the M1 doesn't have any 元 cache – something I'd imagine will change in future M-based CPU's.
#CAN I USE MAC MINI FOR HOME RECORDING FOR MAC#
Mac mini (M1) cache CPU cache for Mac mini M1 iMac Pro (10-core) cache CPU cache for 10-core iMac Pro.Īs you can see after a quick glance, the 10-core Intel Xeon in the iMac Pro has much more cache (more than 2x the L1). For a much more informational explainer check this out. L1 is the fastest, followed by L2 and 元 respectively. What is cache? Cache is small, but very fast memory that sits right next to the processor's logic units. Something I haven't seen discussed at all is the fact the M1 has limited cache on the CPU. I don't experience that at all with my iMac Pro. I use a lot of different apps and I tend not to close them that frequently if I can get away with it, every morning when I got to my desk and turned on my M1 Mac mini, the instant on functionality was great, but I found things to be very sluggish for a minute or two as I clicked around to various apps. Note: using swap memory instead of RAM will result in slower computer performance. On my iMac Pro, at most, I've seen 3GB of swap memory in use. I'm talking about seeing swap memory usage of 7-8GB. While using the M1 Mac mini I noticed that my computer would use way more swap memory than my iMac Pro ever has. This unified memory is hella fast, no doubt, but the fact that my iMac Pro has 3x more RAM can't be ignored, especially when it comes to my workflows. Meanwhile, my iMac Pro has 64GB of 2666MHz DD4 ECC RAM. As it turns out, with unified memory (something introduced with the M1), your computer has a single pool of high-bandwidth, low-latency memory that allows apps to share data between the CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine efficiently. If you're not sure what Unified memory is, that's ok, I wasn't sure at first either. Memoryįor starters, the M1 Mac mini has 16GB of what Apple calls Unified memory. So what do these single and multi-core scores mean when it comes to real world usage? To be honest, not as much as you'd think, especially when you take into account some other factors which I'm about to discuss. As you'll see, the M1 scored higher in these benchmarks for single core performance but still significantly lower on the multi-core score. Just to keep things in perspective I'm also including my iMac Pro's GeekBench results here. But as we all know, benchmarks don't always equate to real world performance. Like so many others, I ran GeekBench on my M1 Mac mini and the results were impressive with the highest single core performance on any Mac and a very respectable multi-core score. So how did the M1 do? The benchmarks Mac mini M1 (Late 2020) The model of M1 Mac mini that I purchased was the one with 16GB unified memory and a 2TB SSD. My plan was to have it replace my iMac Pro as my every day computer. So I went ahead and ordered a brand new M1 Mac mini. So, I thought, perhaps I should put one of these machines to the test? Maybe I don't need an iMac Pro to do my work. These benchmarks looked incredibly promising – for even CPU and GPU intensive tasks such as video editing. I wasn't just surprised by the benchmarks being shared, I was shocked by them. When Apple announced the brand new M1 Macs I was a bit skeptical about the performance but literally every single tech YouTuber shared and gushed about the M1's impressive benchmarks. It's extremely powerful, fast, and quiet. It's the best Mac I've ever owned, only after my 2008 Mac Pro (cheese grater). maybe it's both of us.įor the past three years I've been using an iMac Pro – it's pretty spec'd out with a 3GHz 10-core Intel Xeon CPU, 64GB DDR4 RAM, and a Radeon Pro Vega 64 16 GB video card. Sorry M1 Mac mini, it's not you, it's me.
0 kommentar(er)
